Mentions in other threads 'inspired' me to consider this point.
This is a quote from Paul's JWFacts site about Christadelphians (not a million miles removed from JWs):
"The Bible is God's word and the only message from him. It is without error, except for copying and translation errors."
That opens a can of worms, doesn't it?
Another recent thread prompted me to watch the Bart Ehrman youtube lecture 'Misquoting Jesus' on copying and translating errors - fascinating - and led me to the (not original) thought that once one allows for 'copying and translation errors' combined with deciding which bits were literal and wich allegorical (144,000 anybody?) - let alone later 'corrective interpolations' - one can just about make the Bible say anything one wants.
I was brought up in the Plymouth Brethren where there are no clergy but every 'brother' (keep quiet, sisters!) is expected to be his own student and unsurprisingly their history is characterised (as so many cults/sects of the time) by doctrinal splits. (JWs avoided this by rigid centralised authority a la Rutherford). Well-meaning in the most part but hopelessly under-educated in the most important part of their lives (religion) and prepared to make other peoples' lives a misery because of their own unbending beliefs.
And, of course, to question is to put oneself beyond the pale.
Sad, in so many ways.